Friday, June 22, 2012

Need for Peace


Deeply ingrained in our psyche is the desire for another person’s things.  After all, being created in G-d’s image is a double edged sword. On the one hand, we can make real decisions based on reason rather than instinct.  But, on the other hand, we sometimes forget we are not G-d, and therefore, not everything is meant to be ours (in various places within the liturgy, G-d is referred to as the קונה הכל or the ‘owner of everything’).  I see this often in the budding relationship between my daughter and her five months younger cousinly counterpart.  They are both the best of friends and the worst of enemies, simultaneously.  They can jump on the couch together amidst cries of glee and chase each other around the dining round table chortling as they go, but once there is an object involved, especially if there is only one, and surprisingly, even if there are two, the screams of injustice begin.  If they weren’t under two years old, I’d think they’d gone mad.   More than that, when my daughter takes her cousin’s bottle it produces an otherworldly ecstasy, even if it is just water and even if he didn’t want it.  There is a deep seated pleasure in taking from another despite the damage that results. 

                That is the way the world is built- it naturally frays.  If we don’t actively put it together, it will fall apart.  Apart from experiencing this, as we all have, this is embedded in creation itself.  There are many lessons to learn from nature.  Why else would G-d incessantly speak during creation?  If we look at Genesis, G-d is not only ‘creating’ as one might expect during ‘creation’, but everything is prefaced with ‘G-d said’ over and over again to teach us that creation itself is a communication to us. We can look at creation and learn from it.   Present cosmology- the universe is constantly expanding and constantly moving farther apart-tells us that personal growth should be daily and that the world naturally tends to drift apart.  And as we'll see, if we don’t actively put it back together, we are held responsible for causing it to fall apart, which is the lesson taught to us by Moses in his episode with Korach. (See Or Hatzafon 'The depth of preventing dispute')

                Moses was plagued by two enemies throughout his life, Dathan and Aviram.  They tried to get him killed in Egypt when he struck the Egyptian, and later when Moses and Aharon are in negotiations with Pharoh they distrust that it is for their benefit.  And in various other episodes, they are at the heart of the problem.  Yet, despite all of this, when they once again side with the villain, Korach, Moses still goes to them in order try and resolve the issue.[1]  Even more terrifying, the Talmud says that had Moshe not done this, he would have been considered as if he fomented dispute.[2]  Imagine, not only is a person considered to be non-peaceful from passivity, but even if you don’t actively attempt peace with old enemies is a person considered non-peaceful.  And that is because ingrained in us as kids, and ingrained in the universe is that the world drifts apart.  If we don’t actively stand up to fight it we are in a sense causing it.  That is why the live and let live mentality doesn’t work.  If we are not building relationships, from the Torah's perspective, we are responsible for their inevitable destruction. 
               
                                 



[1] Numbers 16:2
[2] Sanhedrin 110