Friday, July 25, 2014

Finding the silver lining



 

This Torah idea should serve as a protection for all of our Brothers fighting in Gaza…

            G-d’s final message to the Jews is strange.[1] The fourth book of the Torah is full of dramatic twists and turns in Jewish destiny. From a 38 year extension in the desert to the deaths of Miriam and Aaron, it ends with a mundane recount of their journeys in the desert.   What is the crucial message conveyed in the journey that it needs to be systematically recounted?  

            There are four paradigmatic ideas in highlighting the journeys. First, the wanderings in the desert were a consequence for the sin of the spies; yet, we see that the consequence was not a constant wandering without respite.  The Jews camped at some places for over a year.  We learn that even when there is a Divine consequence it is done with a sprinkle of love.  Perhaps, this recent war in Gaza is an example of this where the following story has been related:

Through our incursions into Gaza it was uncovered that Hamas had planned a terrible calamity. This Rosh Hashana they had planned to send out 200 terrorists from each of the tunnels and decimate and destroy the Israeli communities in the south.
The mother of one of the 3 murdered boys said "Now I know where all our prayers and achudut (Unity of Jewish People coming together) went."
On our children's behalf, everyone prayed and were united for 18 days all over Israel. This led to the Gaza War and discovery of the tunnels in Israel! Many thousand would have been murdered in an unparalleled tragedy!
With unity we will have turn sadness to joy and suffering to salvation.

            The second idea is the following metaphor.  The parent of a sick child who goes to different places to find a cure will recount his journey after the child has recovered. So too, it is the realization that the purpose of wandering in the desert was to cure the Jews of their spiritual blemishes and each place they went to had a unique ability to help them.  This is a level deeper than the previous answer- not only was the consequence not as severe as it could have been, but the consequence itself was not a mindless punishment, but a consequence with the power to heal. 

            A third idea has a different bent. Maimonides says that by highlighting the places where Israel journeyed we can confirm that indeed none of these places had food or water there.  So the fact that the Jews survived for forty years in the desert could only have been through a prolonged miracle.  In a sense, this miracle is much bigger than the exodus from Egypt as it was constant.

            Finally, the Kabbalistic perspective is that these 42 places that the Jews ventured reference a 42 letter name of G-d.  This name is also hinted at in the beginning of creation.  Again, within the complications of life, a person needs to find the divine and loving hand, but only a spiritually refined person can do it.[2]

            Israel’s journey is precarious at the moment, and we are not sure exactly how it will unfold.  But, with the proper perspective, we can find the silver lining that is always there.
           





[1] The book of Deuteronomy is written from man’s perspective and approved by G-d. The first four books are straight from G-d. 
[2] See Kiddushin 71a 

Thursday, July 17, 2014

A perilous journey


 File:Sheep flock grazing.jpg


These words of Torah are dedicated to the soldiers risking their lives in Gaza- may it serve as a protection. 

                As my belongings slowly make their way into boxes and I prepare for the impending journey to Boston, I wonder- do I have the right to leave Israel?  Maimonides says that a Jew is forbidden to leave Israel except under certain conditions: to make a living, to learn Torah, to marry a wife, or to rescue Jews from persecution.[1]  So, I suppose I do qualify on the first two accounts, and if I were going to France, I might have the last reason in my pocket as well. However, beyond the technical, there could be deeper reasons to spend some time away from the holy land, and it is not because of rockets. 

                The initial hesitation to make Israel the universal Jewish homeland came from two tribes that decided to call present day Jordan their home instead. They cited superior fodder for their large flock.    A question emerges, though, that requires explanation.  How could the most spiritual generation in Jewish history have a large percentage of its population still prioritize material wealth over spiritual growth?[2]  

                We see from Moses’ response that he didn’t have a problem with the concept of staying in Jordan for the sake of their flock.  He challenged them on the abandonment of their brothers at a time of war. So, they replied that there was no concern for abandonment, and that they would only settle after Israel was completely conquered.  But, not all was kosher as we do see that these two tribes were the first two to be exiled. 

                The reason there was no issue with the request is because material wealth is not necessarily a contradiction to spiritual growth.  All matter in this world, not just in Israel, can be used in an ethical way that increases Divinity in this world. In potential, the greater the material, the greater the spark it produces when used for a noble purpose. And each person needs to find the place where they can best accomplish that.  Gad and Reuben thought that they could best actualize their potential in Jordan, and it could be they were right.  The only catch is that the more material something is, the more difficult it is to flip it towards a holy purpose; the physical world’s magnetism is naturally suited towards our ego. There are hints that despite their desire to fulfill their purpose, some desire for materialism had in fact ensnared them.  The commentaries point out that they put their flock before their children.[3]  

                A little incident highlights the two perspectives. This week, I pulled around a blind corner into the other lane (thanks to some illegally parked cars) and a car came in the other direction.  We met with the impact of a low speed bumper car.  Luckily, both cars were aged and have their fair share of wrinkles.   The damage was minimal and with such low expectations for material beauty, the incident was relaxed and both sides decided to let go of any claims.  With less material expectation, life flows easier. I know in America that won’t fly. Once there is a heavier emphasis on the material, it takes on a life of its own even with the best of intentions.   




[1] Hilchos Melachim 5:9
[2] See Rav Dessler volume 2 parshas Mattos
[3] See Bamidbar 32:16 and Rashi